Maintenance Program Assessment

$2,000.00

Maintenance Program Assessment

Purpose Provide a concise, actionable evaluation of a facility’s maintenance program for water and wastewater treatment systems. Identify gaps, prioritize corrective actions, and recommend measurable improvements to increase equipment reliability, reduce downtime, and optimize operating cost.

Scope

  • Mechanical, electrical, instrumentation, and control systems supporting treatment processes

  • Preventive, predictive, and corrective maintenance practices

  • Spare parts management, vendor support, and contract services

  • Maintenance planning, scheduling, and work execution

  • Maintenance-related training, competency, and safety practices

  • CMMS review and data quality

  • Key performance indicators (KPIs) and continuous improvement processes

Assessment Methodology

  1. Document review

    • Maintenance SOPs, PM task lists, lubrication and alignment procedures, isolation/lockout guides

    • Equipment OEM manuals, electrical schematics, P&IDs, and past work orders

    • Spare parts inventory records, service contracts, and warranty files

    • CMMS reports (backlog, overdue PMs, work order cycle times), safety incident logs, and training records

  2. Site inspection and interviews

    • Walkdown of critical assets (pumps, blowers, mixers, chemical feed, screens, clarifiers, motors, valves)

    • Visual inspection for alignment, vibration, leakage, corrosion, and improper installations

    • Interviews with operations, maintenance technicians, stores, and management to verify practices and constraints

  3. Data analysis

    • CMMS data integrity and KPI validation

    • Failure mode analysis for repeat failures and root causes

    • Spare parts lead time vs. stocking strategy

    • Maintenance labor utilization and overtime trends

  4. Risk and criticality assessment

    • Assign criticality to assets using consequence-of-failure criteria (safety, environmental, production, cost)

    • Prioritize PMs and predictive tasks based on criticality and failure history

Findings (typical issues)

  • Incomplete or obsolete PM task lists; PMs not reflecting OEM guidance or actual field conditions

  • CMMS data poor quality: incomplete work order histories, inconsistent coding, and large overdue PM backlogs

  • Reactive maintenance culture with high emergency repair rates and excessive overtime

  • Spare parts shortages for long-lead items and poor stocking policy for critical spares

  • Insufficient predictive maintenance (PdM) coverage: limited vibration,

We analyze flow, habitat, and water chemistry to give you a clear blueprint for river stewardship.

Maintenance Program Assessment

Purpose Provide a concise, actionable evaluation of a facility’s maintenance program for water and wastewater treatment systems. Identify gaps, prioritize corrective actions, and recommend measurable improvements to increase equipment reliability, reduce downtime, and optimize operating cost.

Scope

  • Mechanical, electrical, instrumentation, and control systems supporting treatment processes

  • Preventive, predictive, and corrective maintenance practices

  • Spare parts management, vendor support, and contract services

  • Maintenance planning, scheduling, and work execution

  • Maintenance-related training, competency, and safety practices

  • CMMS review and data quality

  • Key performance indicators (KPIs) and continuous improvement processes

Assessment Methodology

  1. Document review

    • Maintenance SOPs, PM task lists, lubrication and alignment procedures, isolation/lockout guides

    • Equipment OEM manuals, electrical schematics, P&IDs, and past work orders

    • Spare parts inventory records, service contracts, and warranty files

    • CMMS reports (backlog, overdue PMs, work order cycle times), safety incident logs, and training records

  2. Site inspection and interviews

    • Walkdown of critical assets (pumps, blowers, mixers, chemical feed, screens, clarifiers, motors, valves)

    • Visual inspection for alignment, vibration, leakage, corrosion, and improper installations

    • Interviews with operations, maintenance technicians, stores, and management to verify practices and constraints

  3. Data analysis

    • CMMS data integrity and KPI validation

    • Failure mode analysis for repeat failures and root causes

    • Spare parts lead time vs. stocking strategy

    • Maintenance labor utilization and overtime trends

  4. Risk and criticality assessment

    • Assign criticality to assets using consequence-of-failure criteria (safety, environmental, production, cost)

    • Prioritize PMs and predictive tasks based on criticality and failure history

Findings (typical issues)

  • Incomplete or obsolete PM task lists; PMs not reflecting OEM guidance or actual field conditions

  • CMMS data poor quality: incomplete work order histories, inconsistent coding, and large overdue PM backlogs

  • Reactive maintenance culture with high emergency repair rates and excessive overtime

  • Spare parts shortages for long-lead items and poor stocking policy for critical spares

  • Insufficient predictive maintenance (PdM) coverage: limited vibration,

We analyze flow, habitat, and water chemistry to give you a clear blueprint for river stewardship.