Image 1 of 1
Maintenance Program Assessment
Maintenance Program Assessment
Purpose Provide a concise, actionable evaluation of a facility’s maintenance program for water and wastewater treatment systems. Identify gaps, prioritize corrective actions, and recommend measurable improvements to increase equipment reliability, reduce downtime, and optimize operating cost.
Scope
Mechanical, electrical, instrumentation, and control systems supporting treatment processes
Preventive, predictive, and corrective maintenance practices
Spare parts management, vendor support, and contract services
Maintenance planning, scheduling, and work execution
Maintenance-related training, competency, and safety practices
CMMS review and data quality
Key performance indicators (KPIs) and continuous improvement processes
Assessment Methodology
Document review
Maintenance SOPs, PM task lists, lubrication and alignment procedures, isolation/lockout guides
Equipment OEM manuals, electrical schematics, P&IDs, and past work orders
Spare parts inventory records, service contracts, and warranty files
CMMS reports (backlog, overdue PMs, work order cycle times), safety incident logs, and training records
Site inspection and interviews
Walkdown of critical assets (pumps, blowers, mixers, chemical feed, screens, clarifiers, motors, valves)
Visual inspection for alignment, vibration, leakage, corrosion, and improper installations
Interviews with operations, maintenance technicians, stores, and management to verify practices and constraints
Data analysis
CMMS data integrity and KPI validation
Failure mode analysis for repeat failures and root causes
Spare parts lead time vs. stocking strategy
Maintenance labor utilization and overtime trends
Risk and criticality assessment
Assign criticality to assets using consequence-of-failure criteria (safety, environmental, production, cost)
Prioritize PMs and predictive tasks based on criticality and failure history
Findings (typical issues)
Incomplete or obsolete PM task lists; PMs not reflecting OEM guidance or actual field conditions
CMMS data poor quality: incomplete work order histories, inconsistent coding, and large overdue PM backlogs
Reactive maintenance culture with high emergency repair rates and excessive overtime
Spare parts shortages for long-lead items and poor stocking policy for critical spares
Insufficient predictive maintenance (PdM) coverage: limited vibration,
We analyze flow, habitat, and water chemistry to give you a clear blueprint for river stewardship.
Maintenance Program Assessment
Purpose Provide a concise, actionable evaluation of a facility’s maintenance program for water and wastewater treatment systems. Identify gaps, prioritize corrective actions, and recommend measurable improvements to increase equipment reliability, reduce downtime, and optimize operating cost.
Scope
Mechanical, electrical, instrumentation, and control systems supporting treatment processes
Preventive, predictive, and corrective maintenance practices
Spare parts management, vendor support, and contract services
Maintenance planning, scheduling, and work execution
Maintenance-related training, competency, and safety practices
CMMS review and data quality
Key performance indicators (KPIs) and continuous improvement processes
Assessment Methodology
Document review
Maintenance SOPs, PM task lists, lubrication and alignment procedures, isolation/lockout guides
Equipment OEM manuals, electrical schematics, P&IDs, and past work orders
Spare parts inventory records, service contracts, and warranty files
CMMS reports (backlog, overdue PMs, work order cycle times), safety incident logs, and training records
Site inspection and interviews
Walkdown of critical assets (pumps, blowers, mixers, chemical feed, screens, clarifiers, motors, valves)
Visual inspection for alignment, vibration, leakage, corrosion, and improper installations
Interviews with operations, maintenance technicians, stores, and management to verify practices and constraints
Data analysis
CMMS data integrity and KPI validation
Failure mode analysis for repeat failures and root causes
Spare parts lead time vs. stocking strategy
Maintenance labor utilization and overtime trends
Risk and criticality assessment
Assign criticality to assets using consequence-of-failure criteria (safety, environmental, production, cost)
Prioritize PMs and predictive tasks based on criticality and failure history
Findings (typical issues)
Incomplete or obsolete PM task lists; PMs not reflecting OEM guidance or actual field conditions
CMMS data poor quality: incomplete work order histories, inconsistent coding, and large overdue PM backlogs
Reactive maintenance culture with high emergency repair rates and excessive overtime
Spare parts shortages for long-lead items and poor stocking policy for critical spares
Insufficient predictive maintenance (PdM) coverage: limited vibration,
We analyze flow, habitat, and water chemistry to give you a clear blueprint for river stewardship.